Introduction
Sustainable development is not a new concept—it has existed since time immemorial. But somewhere along the way, we forgot sustainability and blindly followed development. Whenever we hear the phrase “sustainable development”, things like organic food, solar energy, and electric vehicles often come to mind. However, these solutions require long-term funding for survival. Almost every product that ensures sustainability comes with a heavy price tag.
So, when we talk about “sustainable development as a universal goal,” we must think twice. Isn’t sustainability today more of an elite lifestyle choice than a lifeline for all of humanity?
Although developed and developing countries constantly discuss these issues on global platforms—addressing carbon emissions, global warming, recycling, zero plastic use, and green technologies—the reality outside those luxury conference halls is starkly different. Billions of people are still struggling for basic needs. This contradiction needs serious thought and a stronger voice so it can be heard globally.
Why This Question is Worth Discussing
The revolution of sustainability is deeply rooted in economics. Awareness alone cannot turn ideas into reality—it needs action, and action requires resources. The world’s poorest nations lack the funds to access those resources.
Sustainable products are often far more expensive than ordinary alternatives. For example, organic farming products are priced so high that many people are forced to buy cheaper, harmful options instead. Similarly, BPA-free plastics, recycled goods, and eco-friendly clothing remain out of reach for the majority.
Solution to the Problem
To make sustainable development a truly global approach, international cooperation is essential. Struggling countries need financial support to survive amidst powerful economies. Technology and innovation must focus on providing maximum benefits with minimum harm.
Yet, millions of people still lack access to electricity, clean fuel, and basic amenities. They cannot afford modern waste management systems, green transportation, or large-scale environmental projects.
It is the poor, surviving on daily wages, who are most affected by climate change. When floods, droughts, or storms hit, their conditions worsen drastically because their survival depends heavily on natural resources like forests and agriculture. Most work in areas where neither government support nor safety measures reach them.
Governments must create policies that address both poverty and sustainability. One possible solution is to support cottage industries, handicrafts, and traditional arts, which depend largely on manpower. These can provide employment to the poor while also promoting environmental sustainability.
Importantly, the prices of sustainable products must be made affordable so they are accessible to the masses—not just the elite. After all, the number of poor people far exceeds the wealthy. For sustainability to succeed, markets must cater to this larger section of society.
Conclusion
This issue is closely tied to poverty, and poverty cannot be solved by sustainability alone. If we want true progress, we must work toward both goals simultaneously—poverty eradication and sustainable development. One without the other is incomplete. To achieve real sustainable development, we must cross the finish line together.
